There’s an interesting imbalance in the paranormal world that doesn’t get talked about enough.
Believers tend to just… get on with it.
They investigate. They experiment. They sometimes disagree on methods, tools, theories, and interpretations. But, they build equipment, develop apps, analyse audio, review footage, and head back out into the dark to do it all again. Whether you think they’re right or wrong, most believers are focused on doing.
Sceptics and non-believers, on the other hand, often seem far less content to simply disagree.
Instead of quietly dismissing the paranormal and moving on with their lives, a vocal subset goes out of its way to mock, ridicule, and publicly belittle those who believe. Not just critique the evidence — but attack the people. The tone isn’t curiosity or even healthy skepticism; it’s contempt. Laughing emojis. Sarcasm. Pile-ons. Personal insults.
At times, it feels less like rational inquiry and more like ideological extremism.
Skepticism vs. Hostility
Let’s be clear: skepticism itself is not the problem. Genuine skepticism is valuable. It asks questions. It challenges assumptions. It improves standards and forces better thinking.
But what we often see online isn’t skepticism — it’s performative disbelief.
This version of skepticism doesn’t investigate. It doesn’t test. It doesn’t replicate. It watches a clip, reads a headline, or sees an app name, and immediately jumps to mockery. The goal isn’t understanding or truth — it’s social dominance. “Look how clever I am for not believing this.”
Ironically, this behaviour mirrors the very thing sceptics often accuse believers of: emotional thinking, tribalism, and blind certainty.
The Quiet Hypocrisy
Here’s where it gets uncomfortable.
A surprising number of outspoken non-believers — the same ones who mock, ridicule, and dismiss — also have a ghost story of their own. A moment they can’t explain. Something they experienced “that one time.” A childhood event. A strange encounter they brush off with nervous laughter.
They’ll tell you it definitely wasn’t paranormal — but they also can’t quite tell you what it was.
So why the hostility?
Often, ridicule is a defence mechanism. If you mock something loudly enough, you never have to sit with the idea that your worldview might have cracks in it. Making fun of believers becomes a way to reassure yourself — and your peers — that you’re safely on the “rational” side.
Should Believers Start Mocking Back?
Here’s the provocative question:
Why is ridicule a one-way street?
Believers are routinely portrayed as gullible, unintelligent, or delusional — yet believers rarely return the favour. There’s an unspoken expectation that they should be polite, patient, and endlessly accommodating to hostility.
But perhaps that’s part of the imbalance.
Maybe believers should start pointing out the irony. The contradiction of people who “don’t care” about the paranormal yet spend enormous amounts of time attacking it. The sceptics who claim absolute certainty while dismissing entire categories of human experience without investigation. The non-believers who laugh at ghost stories — right up until they quietly admit they have one.
That doesn’t mean becoming cruel or abusive. It means refusing to accept mockery as intellectual superiority.
Belief Isn’t the Enemy of Reason
Believing that something might exist is not the same as claiming absolute truth. Most paranormal researchers don’t say, “We know exactly what this is.” They say, “Something odd happened, and we don’t have a full explanation yet.”
That position is far closer to real science than blind denial.
History is full of examples where certainty aged badly.
Curiosity moved humanity forward — not ridicule.
Final Thought
If you don’t believe in the paranormal, that’s fine. Truly. Live your life, enjoy your certainty, and move on.
But if disbelief requires constant mockery, public shaming, and aggressive dismissal of others just to feel secure… maybe the belief system isn’t as solid as it claims to be.
Believers will keep doing what they’ve always done: exploring, questioning, experimenting, and sharing experiences.
And maybe it’s time they stopped apologising for it.
Next Post
Science Isn’t as Advanced as We Think — And Understanding It Makes That Clear
We live in a world surrounded by technology that feels futuristic. Smartphones answer questions in ... Read more
Previous Post
The Mystery of Tarot: History, Symbolism, and the Spiritual Power Behind the Cards
For centuries, Tarot has been one of the most recognisable and intriguing tools in the ... Read more